Islamic Terrorism and Slothful Induction, example II

From the Weekend Australian, 4-5 October, 2014, a letter to the Oz from Chief of Defence Force, Mark Binskin.

A quote highlighted beside the article “Sailor attack turns into furphy” (27/9) said I had apologized to the Muslim community. This is incorrect. During a doorstop at the Australian War Memorial the previous day, I said: ”On behalf of the Australian Defence Force, I would like to apologise to the Australian community and particularly the Middle Eastern community for any angst this has caused.” While I appreciate the full quote was included, many of your readers would have only read the quote highlighted.

The terrorist threat is not about religion. No religion would accept the acts we have witnessed recently. The threat is about criminals, at home and abroad, who seek to harm others, and those of us who are in a position to influence public discussion about this have a responsibility to differentiate between senseless acts of violence and what is a peaceful religion.


About Stebbing Heuer

A person interested in exploring human perception, reasoning, judgement and deciding, and in promoting clear, effective thinking and the making of good decisions.
This entry was posted in Formal fallacies in reasoning and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s